From the category archives:

Features

When working with buyers from larger cities around the country: Chicago, New York, Boston, Philadelphia and Seattle to name a few, it often comes as a surprise to these transplants that it’s not as easy to distinguish neighborhoods like you can in, say, Chicago: Bucktown, Lakeview, Wrigleyville, Lincoln Park, Gold Coast or The Loop.  I bring Chicago up because I happened to take a trip there recently and thought to myself, “What if Phoenix had grown up this way?”

“What if Phoenix chose to grow upward and not outward for the past twenty to fifty years?”

So here’s my wish list for the future. Nothing too crazy and some of it’s already in motion in some areas of the Phoenix Valley …

  1. Density. Sure, there are acres upon acres of pristine desert out there fifty miles from the center of Phoenix but there isn’t much else.  I want to see a focus like Tempe has but in other valley cities.  Encourage growth like Centerpoint Condos, Mosaic and build the infrastructure that’s needed.  Or work to change zoning in areas to encourage more dense growth.But, while I am impressed with Tempe’s growth there are certain things that still make me think that planners haven’t done their job of planning.  Take for instance the CVS Pharmacy that is currently under construction on the corner of University and Mill Avenue.  While it looks like it will be a nice pharmacy at a prime location - and great for the influx of new residents moving in to the Mill Avenue District - it appears that the CVS will only be one story.  Not two.  Not three or four or five.  Just one.

    Better planning, in my mind, would’ve required CVS to include plans lofts, townhomes or condos above even if it only meant four or eight units.  And don’t tell me you couldn’t rent those units out once they were complete.  That would be a prime location for ASU students.  The units don’t have to offer a doorman, granite imported from the middle of some Mongolian mountain or exotic wood flooring.  No, they could be simple and well-made units that offer an ideal location for people who don’t make a quarter of a million or more a year.

  2. Uniqueness. For the most part, Phoenix is a sea of stucco and tile rooftops.  Sure, there are pockets of uniqueness like Old Town Scottsdale, Historic Downtown Chandler, the Willow District near downtown Phoenix and the Mill Avenue District of Downtown Tempe.  But, I’m selfish and I want more.Along with density comes a certain degree of pride in an area.  Pride develops into creating a unique characteristic or personality for that area.  Whether it’s a neighborhood known for the arts, design, gays, a certain architecture, shopping, a certain ethnic group … I don’t care.  I want to be able to tell people “if you go to this area of Chandler/Gilbert/Tempe/Phoenix/Scottsdale you will find (fill in a unique description here)…”  Instead, you’re pretty much going to find more of the same as it stands now.

    Uniqueness can be added and these neighborhood personalities pushed along with innovative buildings that appeal to market segments.  For instance, a development like EcoLogic Lofts in Chicago’s Bucktown would most likely appeal to those interested in living a green lifestyle.  I’d imagine in ten years you’ll see organic bakeries, restaurants or farmer’s markets near this development.

    Tangent: Can someone please tell me why we don’t have developments like EcoLogic Lofts here in Phoenix?  Why aren’t there requirements for adding to the electric grid with mandatory solar panels integrated into building designs?  Sure, there may be developments here and there but it seems like the Valley of the Sun (keyword: sun) would be jumping on this type of design.

  3. Mass-Transit. Sure, we’re well on our way.  I am very excited about the light-rail that debuts in the valley in December.  Connecting west Mesa, Tempe and Central Phoenix, the light-rail project is an exciting development.  Some cities, like Chandler and Scottsdale, are already thinking on how they can jump on that train and connect their cities to realize the benefits.  Most well-developed cities offer a mixture of light-rail/subway, buses and taxis.  In a city as large as the Phoenix metro area, you’d think there would be a viable option for those moving here to give up their car and only take mass-transit.  But there really is not.  Perhaps in five or ten years there will be in Tempe and Phoenix (if you work in those areas or out of your home) but there is not right now.If you planned on moving to New York City you’d give up your car for sure.  Chicago?  Most likely if you chose to live inside the sprawling suburbs.  Seattle?  Similar situation to Chicago.  The point is that the option is there.What the Phoenix valley needs is a focus on speeding-up the development of mass-transit options and integrating them into the current transportation systems.  Mass-transit directly deals with the current energy crisis and the brown cloud that persists over the Phoenix Valley.

That’s it.  Just three items.  Density, Uniqueness and Mass-Transit.  If planners for Phoenix Valley cities developed with these three things in mind I think we’d have a city that offers more than it already does.  Developments like The Metropolitan in Chandler and Southbank in Tempe are great starts.  Chandler’s recent announcements of light-rail and bus schedules are too not to mention Chandler’s ideas to add density to certain run-down, strip mall intersections.

But, being impatient, I sure wish I could jump into the future and see what this valley of opportunity looks like in twenty years!

{ 0 comments }

Chandler May Have Taken A Hint From Sacramento

by Brad Shaffer on July 9, 2008

I wrote yesterday about Chandler, Arizona’s initiative to bring walkable urbanism and higher-density living to intersections that currently have worn down strip malls.  It seems that cities who have been dealing with suburban sprawl a lot longer than Chandler are also on the right path.

The Wall Street Journal wrote about Sacramento’s Blueprint plan for changing it’s growth strategy.  The “Blueprint” for the future - which sets goals of how Sacramento should look in 2050 - was adopted in 2004 and includes goals of creating walkable environments where work, entertainment and living are all in the immediate neighborhood.  Furthermore, it connects mass-transit options so that if you do need to get across town you don’t have to jump in your car.

Four years later, Sacramento has seen a dramatic increase in higher-density building - to the tune of 533% more apartment, townhomes and condos while traditional suburban communities fell by 21%.

Those who encouraged the Blueprint took an ingenious approach to promoting the idea.  Rather than throwing a bunch of graphs and numbers into a PowerPoint presentation they utilized realistic imagery to show how traditional suburban streetcorners with worn down strip malls could be transformed into a walkable and much more liveable environment.

Take a look at some renderings here - and then imagine areas of Chandler, Tempe, Phoenix, Gilbert or Mesa (or whatever city you live in) and what would happen if they underwent similar changes.

Again, I say “Cheers!” to Chandler for starting the push towards walkable environments.  Chandler already has great plans for Historic Downtown Chandler that include more townhomes, condos, higher-density single family homes, an expanded convention center and more.  Let’s hope Chandler continues to promote higher-density growth and the continuation of linking mass-transit options.

{ 1 comment }

Gas has been at $4 or higher for over a month and gas futures continue to rise through the $130 - $140  a barrel price range.  Oil refineries are losing their asses even with prices so high.

The result?  You can hear and see the change happening.  People are driving less and staying closer to home and reconsidering their “usual” plans.  Consider this:

My wife and I spent the Fourth of July holiday in Indiana.  On the night of the 4th, we were in a mid-size suburban neighborhood southwest of Fort Wayne, Indiana where we were both raised.  In recent past years the streets of suburbia were nearly vacant as most families chose to venture to the many nearby lakes and boat or to nearby major cities like Chicago or Indianapolis for the Fourth.  This year, 2008, it was almost like the hands of time had been turned back to when I was a kid.  Fireworks were going off all around us - indicating that families had chosen to stay home and entertain themselves rather than their usual Fourth of July routine.

I also heard it yesterday as I appeared for Jury Duty in Mesa, Arizona.  The rumblings of “I live in Surprise (a northwest Phoenix suburb, roughly 50+ miles from where we were in Mesa) and I had to drive all the way out here with gas prices like this!”  I even had a great conversation with man in his 50’s who was considering a move to the Mill Avenue District of Tempe so that he could walk to most places (he worked from home).

Times they are a changing. I’ve indicated before that there is an upside to $8 a gallon gas for the Phoenix Valley and the U.S.A.  We’re having a tough time dealing with $4 a gallon gas - how will we deal with it when the prices reach $5? $6? $7? $8?

The good news is that we are starting to deal with it now.  And Chandler seems to be dealing with it head on.  Recently, Chandler announced they would be adding 50% more bus routes to it’s schedule to connect it’s citizens to the light-rail opening in December in Mesa, Tempe and Phoenix.  They’re also adding text message alerts to make “waiting for the bus” less of a hassle allowing riders to be notified on their wireless device when a bus is a few minutes away from their stop.

But here’s an even better solution: real change in how we build our communities in the futureChandler has announced an aggressive change in zoning philosophy that could transform some major intersections from worn-down strip-malls to bustling higher-density walkable environments.  This philosophy changes Chandler’s current initiative which encourages redevelopment by giving strip-malls a makeover with tax payer’s money - a great change in my opinion.

Take for example the intersection of Warner and Alma School Roads.  Currently, a strip-mall that could use a makeover (preferably paid for by it’s owners and not tax payers) sits on the northwest and southwest corner while a Wal-Mart and PetSmart occupy the northeast corner.  A church sits on the southeast corner.  Here’s a very rough photo courtesy of Google Maps and it’s StreetView technology:

The strip-malls - especially with a Wal-Mart - contain the necessities of life.  There is of course the Wal-Mart for household items, a smoothie shop, a Chili’s, an English Pub called Churchills, numerous clothing stores, a dry cleaner, a day spa, banks and more.

What if two or three mid-rise residential or mixed-use (residential and commerical/office) were added to this intersection? Well, for one, people like my friend at Jury Duty would have a few more options for walkable environments in the valley.  For two, there would be an influx of people to this area.  With a thousand or two thousand more people living at this intersection and within a walk from life’s necessities a new walkable urban environment would be born.

Not only that, the residential mid-rise could allow for a mixed bag of demographics as well.  In most city neighborhoods people of all walks of life live side-by-side.  It’s not as segregated as suburbia has made us.  Think about it - from the moment a new home builder places a sign on a parcel of dirt we’ve segregated suburbia.  Potential buyers drive by a new home development sign and either say, “Oh look honey, homes from the $600’s, let’s check it out” or “Oh, what a great location but look, they start in the $600’s and that’s too much for us.”

Additionally, if mid-rise buildings are mixed-use and perhaps the first two or three floors are office space, Chandler can propel it’s economy and the hyper-local economies of these intersections.  Small businesses will flourish in these areas as well as give mid-size and larger companies options outside of downtown Phoenix for satellite or additional office locations.  Of course, workers at these locations will be able to walk to lunch and shop at the current businesses and the new ones that would pop-up as a result of these proposed mid-rise buildings.

Chandler’s plan is certainly in it’s infancy.  But if it picks a few intersections and encourages mid-rise buildings to promote higher density growth then I think we’re on the right track.  What would make the change even more exciting would be if Chandler promotes architecturally distinct buildings for the redevelopment.  God knows we have enough stucco and “desert colored” buildings in our suburban communities.  Innovative glass buildings with unique architecture would also promote neighborhood pride and create a distinction from one neighborhood to the next.

Chandler - and the entire Phoenix Valley - needs to consider growth options that are upward and not outward.  The infrastructure in many of our cities is fantastic.  Show me other cities that have three lane roads in each direction in the middle of suburbia?  You’ll be hard pressed to find them. The point is that we can support higher-density growth in Chandler, Phoenix, Tempe, Gilbert, Mesa, Scottsdale and all across the Valley of the Sun.

Cheers! to Chandler for creating a model for future growth.  Now let’s hope the plan becomes reality!

{ 0 comments }

Get Instant Answers To Your Real Estate Questions

by Brad Shaffer on June 27, 2008

Now, you can talk with us anytime from your computer by chatting online.

At the end of every article we write, you’ll see our current availability to chat online with us… it looks like this:

When you click on the GoogleTalk bubble, a small chat window will appear in your browser and you’ll be able to ask us a question and get an instant answer.

{ 0 comments }

It is 2008, right?  Then why are so many real estate professionals conducting business like it’s 1988?

It’s not uncommon for real estate paperwork to be faxed back-and-forth multiple times.  Have you ever seen a contract that’s been faxed more than once?  The words get grainy, the writing becomes unlegible and it really annoys us.

That’s why we use today’s technology - e-signatures and electronic transaction management.

easyclients never have to worry about not finding the most recent piece of paperwork because it’s available online - 24/7 - via a secure website.  They also know that they can accept offers or make offers from anywhere they have an internet enabled computer.  We like to say “we do business across the table or across the globe.”

Paperless transactions aren’t only smarter, easier and more convenient than yesterday’s procedures - they’re also green. The real estate industry could probably save the Amazon Rainforest if everyone used current technology!

We use the following two services to conduct paperless transactions:

easyclients work with us because it’s just that - easy!

{ 2 comments }